- Random Old Art
- Posts
- "The Town Hall of Amsterdam on Fire in 1652" - Jan Abrahamsz Beerstraaten
"The Town Hall of Amsterdam on Fire in 1652" - Jan Abrahamsz Beerstraaten
Circa 1652-1655
A continuation of yesterdays painting; instead of the fire, its the wreckage the next morning. I love the choice of muted grey colors for the city behind, but that the ruin itself is still bathed in morning light.

(view the full sized image here)
I gave identifying info about this work to Perplexity with the instructions to research it and tell me all the interesting things it could about the work. Here’s what we got:
What remains when a city's heart burns to ash?
In Jan Abrahamsz. Beerstraaten's haunting masterpiece, we witness Amsterdam's gothic town hall transformed from administrative powerhouse to crumbling monument—a testament to both destruction and resilience painted with the precision of an eyewitness and the soul of a poet.
The scene before us is both devastation and strange beauty. The skeletal remains of the old town hall dominate the canvas like ancient ruins, their weathered brick and stone facades rendered in creams, pastel greens, yellows, and pinks under a wan blue sky dotted with clouds. Where once burgomasters conducted the business of Europe's most prosperous trading republic, now only precarious shells remain—the tower's upper floors consumed by flames, weeds sprouting defiantly from crevices in the eroded stone tribunal.
At the painting's center stands the damaged tower where the former burgomasters' chamber once resided, its two clocks forever reading seven o'clock—perhaps the very hour when morning light first revealed the full scope of the catastrophe. To the right, the white-plastered gabled building that once housed the city bank appears almost ghostly, while on the left, we glimpse down the alley running alongside the medieval St. Elizabeth's Hospital. Small figures populate the scene, dwarfed by the architectural devastation around them, their presence serving to emphasize the overwhelming scale of loss while guiding our eyes through this landscape of ruin.
The Night Amsterdam's Heart Stopped Beating
July 7, 1652, began like any other summer day in Amsterdam, but it would end with the city's medieval soul in ashes. The fire erupted around two in the morning, racing through the timber-dry buildings that had served as the seat of Amsterdam's government for over two centuries. Eyewitnesses reported that a barrel of gunpowder exploded in the tower, blowing away part of its wall, while flames poured through the roof and thick clouds of billowing smoke filled the Dam square. The summer had been particularly hot and dry, and an easterly wind—the driest of all—had been blowing for days, creating perfect conditions for the inferno.
Citizens formed bucket brigades, passing leather buckets filled with water from the Damrak, while others wielded 'brandhaaks'—long poles with iron hooks used to tear down walls and prevent the fire from spreading. But their efforts proved futile against the ferocious blaze. As one contemporary poem addressed the burned building: "You were galled to continue slaving, and so you let yourself be buried alive under ruins upon your own simple floor". The fire consumed everything in just three hours, leaving behind only the precarious shell that Beerstraaten would later immortalize in paint.
This catastrophic night would inadvertently birth a revolution in firefighting. A fifteen-year-old boy named Jan van der Heyden witnessed the helpless bucket chains and was so moved by the tragedy that he later invented the first modern fire hose and pressure pump system, complete with iron-reinforced leather hoses that could draw water directly from the canals. The Amsterdam fire had taught the city—and the young inventor—that the old ways of fighting flames were woefully inadequate for protecting urban communities.
A Painter Who Lived the Maritime Life
Jan Abrahamsz. Beerstraaten was no armchair artist painting from imagination. Born in Amsterdam on March 1, 1622, he was baptized in the very Nieuwe Kerk that would overlook the ruins he would later paint. The son of Abraham Danielsz., a tablecloth maker from Emden, Beerstraaten grew up in the bustling Jordaan district on Elandstraat before moving to a house on Rozengracht across from a labyrinth in 1651—just one year before the great fire.
His life reads like an adventure novel of the Dutch Golden Age. As a marine artist specializing in naval battles of the First Anglo-Dutch War and Dutch-Swedish War, Beerstraaten didn't just paint ships—he sailed with them. He captured the likeness of ports from Civitavecchia to countless Dutch harbors, often accompanying fleets to sea to sketch vessels and battles firsthand, much like the renowned Van de Velde artists who risked their lives in small galliots to witness naval warfare up close. This maritime experience gave his work an authenticity that armchair artists couldn't match—he understood the play of light on water, the anatomy of ship rigging, and the drama of wind-filled sails because he had lived it all.
The artist's personal life was marked by both joy and tragedy. He married in 1642 and had twelve children, but fate was unkind to his family. In 1658, none other than Rembrandt, Hendrickje Stoffels, and Titus van Rijn became his neighbors on Rozengracht. In 1664, his wife died after childbirth, likely from the plague, taking three children with her. He remarried in 1665 at the church in Sloterdijk, but died just over a year later in July 1666, his widow following him to the grave three weeks after giving birth. Four of his children were sent to the orphanage, though his youngest sons survived to become a schoolteacher and a carpenter.
The Golden Age Canvas: Oil, Precision, and Dutch Innovation
Beerstraaten's masterpiece was created using oil on canvas, a medium that had revolutionized Northern European painting and was perfectly suited to the Dutch Golden Age's emphasis on detailed realism. The painting measures an impressive 110 by 145 centimeters, giving it substantial presence and allowing viewers to immerse themselves in the detailed architectural landscape. His signature, "I. Beerstraaten," appears in the bottom left corner, marking this work as one of his most significant achievements.
The artist's technique reflects the broader innovations of Dutch Golden Age painting, where artists had moved away from the panoramic, bird's-eye perspectives of earlier marine and architectural art toward a more human, ground-level viewpoint that characterized Renaissance artistic evolution. This lower vantage point creates greater intimacy between viewer and subject, making us feel as though we're standing among the ruins ourselves rather than observing them from an impossible aerial perspective.
The composition demonstrates sophisticated understanding of visual storytelling. Beerstraaten employs what modern artists call "asymmetrical balance," avoiding the static central placement that would split the composition in half. Instead, the tower serves as a strong vertical anchor slightly off-center, while the horizontal sweep of damaged buildings creates movement across the canvas. The small figures scattered throughout provide scale and human interest, their placement carefully orchestrated to guide the viewer's eye through the scene without overwhelming the architectural drama.
Witness to History: The Artist's Front-Row Seat
When the Amsterdam town hall erupted in flames that July night, Beerstraaten was perfectly positioned to witness the catastrophe. Living on Rozengracht, he would have seen the orange glow against the night sky and likely joined the crowds that gathered on Dam Square to watch the inferno consume their city's administrative heart. Unlike many artists who worked from sketches made by others or relied on written descriptions, Beerstraaten had the advantage of being an eyewitness to one of Amsterdam's most dramatic historical moments.
This direct experience shows in every brushstroke of his painting. The accuracy of architectural details, the precise rendering of how fire-damaged stone weathers and crumbles, the way morning light falls across ruins—these elements could only come from someone who had seen the aftermath firsthand. The painting captures not just the physical reality of destruction but the emotional weight of loss, the strange melancholy beauty that emerges when human ambition meets natural forces.
The work belongs to a broader tradition of Dutch disaster painting that emerged during the 17th century, when artists began documenting contemporary catastrophes with the same precision they applied to still lifes or portraits. Amsterdam's Old Town Hall fire, the 1654 Delft gunpowder explosion, and other urban disasters provided Dutch artists with dramatic subjects that combined historical documentation with artistic expression. These paintings served as both memorial and warning, preserving the memory of tragedy while celebrating the resilience of Dutch urban life.
From Medieval Modesty to Classical Grandeur
The ruins Beerstraaten painted represented more than just architectural destruction—they marked the end of Amsterdam's medieval identity and the birth of its classical aspirations. The old Gothic town hall had been cramped and rotting, no longer suited to a city that saw itself as rivaling Venice or ancient Athens. Planning for its replacement had actually begun in 1639, three years before the fire, when burgomasters complained that their current home was so decrepit that an accident was imminent.
The fire simply accelerated what was already inevitable. Construction of Jacob van Campen's magnificent new town hall—now the Royal Palace—had begun in 1648, inspired by the confidence that filled Amsterdam after peace with Spain was declared. The Treaty of Munster secured Amsterdam's dominance of European trade by ensuring the continued blockage of the Scheldt River, directing commerce away from Antwerp and toward Dutch ports. When the old building burned, it cleared the way not just physically but symbolically for Amsterdam's transformation from a medieval trading town into a classical imperial city.
The new town hall, completed in 1655, was hailed as the eighth wonder of the world. Built on 13,659 wooden piles and designed as a celebration of Amsterdam's prosperity, it represented everything the old Gothic structure was not—spacious, magnificent, and consciously classical in its proportions and decoration. The juxtaposition between Beerstraaten's crumbling ruins and the gleaming new palace that rose in their place perfectly captures the dramatic transformation of Dutch society during the Golden Age.
The Artist's Final Voyage
Beerstraaten created this haunting memorial sometime between 1652 and 1666, the year of his death. It stands as perhaps his greatest work, combining his maritime artist's eye for atmospheric detail with his historian's sense of documentary importance. The painting preserves not just the physical appearance of the ruins but the emotional resonance of a moment when Amsterdam's past and future stood side by side—medieval stones crumbling while classical dreams took shape.
In the broader context of Dutch Golden Age art, Beerstraaten's ruins painting represents something uniquely powerful: a work that transforms contemporary disaster into timeless meditation on change, loss, and renewal. While his contemporaries painted biblical scenes, portraits of prosperous merchants, or idealized landscapes, Beerstraaten chose to document a moment of urban trauma with the same careful attention other artists reserved for more pleasant subjects. His ruins remind us that even in an age of unprecedented prosperity and artistic achievement, the Dutch never forgot that fortune could change as quickly as the wind on the Zuider Zee.
The Painter's Legacy
Beerstraaten died in 1666 and was buried in the Westerkerk, leaving behind a body of work that captured the maritime soul of the Dutch Republic. His paintings of winter scenes, naval battles, and Dutch harbors provide an invaluable record of 17th-century life, but none carry the emotional weight of his town hall ruins. The work demonstrates how great art can transform tragedy into beauty, disaster into dignity, and endings into beginnings.
Today, as we look at Beerstraaten's masterpiece, we see more than just architectural ruins—we see a moment when one era ended and another began, captured by an artist who understood that sometimes the most important stories are told not in the building up, but in the burning down. In those crumbling walls and weathered stones, Amsterdam's medieval past made way for its Golden Age future, and a humble maritime painter created his most enduring monument to the city he loved.
And that's it!
If you have any details you think Perplexity left out, reply to this email and I'll adjust my prompt to nudge it to include it next time.
This blog was part of my daily newsletter. You can subscribe to it here.
Thanks for reading!
-JP
Current prompt: I want you to create a newsletter post describing the fun and exciting stories around a painting. It should be a newsletter read for leisure and should be an enjoyable read (not just a list of facts) here's what you’re gonna do: Find the name of the following painting in its original language and any alternative names it goes by. Then Research the painting and give me blurb telling me all you can about the artist, the historical context/events it was created in, the style, the materials used, the composition and visual elements, the story/underlying message, what inspired the work/what it meant to the author, and whatever other info you find that helps give a complete understanding of the work. A description of what is depicted (mention subjects) should be the first thing, while the “biography” of the artist should be last. if the work has a lot of meaning behind it, then that is what the meat of the newsletter should be. Besides that you are free to present the information in a concise and captivating way, with the most interesting and novel stuff closest to the top. Order the presentation of information for which pieces have the most compelling and interesting story to tell. At least some of the description should be formatted like a story. [for example: a couple sits on a bench watching the sunset while a man next to them…]. ONLY include information that is for THIS SPECIFIC PAINTING. you will find info on paintings similar to this one but NOT this one. OMMIT INFO ABOUT SUCH PIECES. remember, the goal is to make the most compelling, intriguing, and fun to read newsletter as possible, so keep that above all else.