This is one of those paintings I chose to include here that are not as well documented. It was painted during the Dutch golden age (~1600s) which was one of the earliest art periods contains these types of landscape paintings that “try” to be realistic. A lot of landscapes painted earlier have impossible geometries or are painted in a way that perspective doesn’t really exists, which is something you don’t really get as much in more recent/Romantic landscapes.

(view the full sized image here)

I gave identifying info about this work to Perplexity with the instructions to research it and tell me all the interesting things it could about the work. Here’s what we got:

The Haarlem Lock: A Masterpiece Hidden in Plain Sight

De Haarlemmersluis stands as one of the most remarkable urban landscapes of the Dutch Golden Age, yet it remains Meindert Hobbema's best-kept secret. Known in its original Dutch as "De Haarlemmersluis, Amsterdam" (c. 1663-65), this painting holds the extraordinary distinction of being the only cityscape ever attempted by a master who devoted his entire career to woodland scenes. In Dutch, "Haarlemmersluis" translates directly to "Haarlem Lock," named after the route leading west to the city of Haarlem.

At the heart of Amsterdam's bustling waterfront, a lone lock-keeper stands at his post, wielding a long wooden lever that controls the gates between two of the city's most vital waterways. The Singel canal flows in from the right while the Brouwersgracht stretches across the immediate foreground, and at their junction sits the Haarlem Lock—a humble yet crucial piece of Amsterdam's maritime machinery. Behind the lock-keeper, like a forest of ambition reaching toward the sky, cluster the masts of a dozen square-rigged merchant ships, silent testimony to Holland's dominance over the world's oceans. To the right, the Herring-Packers' Tower (Haaringpakkerstoren) rises with its elegant spire, a 15th-century fortification crowned with early 17th-century architectural flourishes.

What makes this painting so captivating is not merely what Hobbema chose to paint, but why he painted it at all. Here was an artist who had built his reputation on sun-dappled forest clearings and rustic watermills, yet something about this particular intersection of water and stone compelled him to abandon his signature subject matter for the only time in his documented career. The painting captures a moment of perfect harmony between Amsterdam's carefully engineered canal system and the vast commercial empire it supported—a visual metaphor for how the Dutch Republic had learned to harness both nature and human ingenuity.

The lock itself represents far more than a simple water-control mechanism. Built in 1602 as part of Amsterdam's sea dike, the Haarlem Lock was one of eight such structures that gave the city unprecedented control over its water levels. Before these locks, Amsterdam's canals rose and fell with the North Sea's tides, but the lock-keepers could now regulate water flow with precision, preventing flooding while maintaining the delicate balance needed for navigation. This technological mastery was so significant that Amsterdam's water level became the standard measurement (Normaal Amsterdams Peil) used across Northern Europe.

Hobbema painted this scene during the height of the Dutch Golden Age, when Amsterdam had become the beating heart of global commerce. The Dutch East India Company, founded in 1602, was worth an estimated $7.9 trillion in today's terms—more than the combined value of the world's top twenty companies today. The clustered masts visible beyond the lock weren't just ships; they were the physical manifestation of an economic miracle that had transformed a collection of rebellious provinces into Europe's dominant maritime power.

The composition itself tells a story of order imposed upon chaos. Hobbema positioned the viewer at water level, creating an intimate perspective that draws the eye naturally toward the lock-keeper—the human figure who represents control over the natural elements. The painting's horizontal format emphasizes the expansive reach of Amsterdam's harbor, while the vertical elements of ship masts and the tower create a sense of aspiration and achievement. Every architectural detail, from the precise stonework of the lock to the ornate spire of the Herring-Packers' Tower, speaks to Dutch craftsmanship and civic pride.

The Herring-Packers' Tower deserves special attention in this urban drama. Originally called the Holy Cross Tower during Catholic rule, it was renamed after Amsterdam's Protestant Reformation in 1578. The tower served as both a fortification and a meeting place for the herring packers—the workers who salted and barreled fish in the adjacent warehouse. When a small bell rang from the tower, herring packers throughout the neighborhood had to report for work, making it a symbol of both civic organization and economic productivity. The tower was demolished in 1829 during a period of municipal cost-cutting, making Hobbema's painting one of the few surviving visual records of this architectural landmark.

The painting's technique reflects Hobbema's maturation as an artist during the 1660s, when he developed his distinctive style following years of studying under Jacob van Ruisdael. Where Ruisdael favored dramatic, stormy atmospheres, Hobbema preferred clearer, brighter compositions that emphasized harmony over conflict. His brushwork in "The Haarlem Lock" demonstrates this evolution—the water reflects light with crystalline clarity, the stonework is rendered with architectural precision, and the sky maintains the luminous quality that would become his signature.

What inspired Hobbema to venture beyond his woodland comfort zone remains one of art history's intriguing mysteries. The painting may have been commissioned by Amsterdam's municipal government or by wealthy merchants who wanted to commemorate their city's commercial achievements. Alternatively, Hobbema—who lived on the Haarlemmerdijk by 1668—may have simply been inspired by a scene he witnessed daily during his walks through the neighborhood. The view shows the area before alterations made in 1661-62, suggesting either that Hobbema painted from memory or that he began the work earlier than previously thought.

The painting also serves as a time capsule of a vanished Amsterdam. None of the buildings visible in Hobbema's composition survive today. The Herring-Packers' Tower fell to the demolition crews in 1829, and the entire waterfront has been transformed by centuries of urban development. Where Hobbema painted open water and medieval fortifications, modern Amsterdam displays railway stations, office buildings, and tourist attractions. His painting preserves not just the physical appearance of 17th-century Amsterdam, but also its spirit—a time when Dutch engineering and commerce were reshaping the world.

The Artist Behind the Masterpiece

Meindert Hobbema's life story reads like a testament to artistic determination triumphing over personal adversity. Born as Meyndert Lubbertsz in Amsterdam on October 31, 1638, to a carpenter named Lubbert Meyndertsz, he adopted the surname "Hobbema" for reasons that remain mysterious to this day. At age fifteen, tragedy struck when he and his younger siblings were sent to an Amsterdam orphanage, circumstances that would shape his self-reliant character throughout his artistic career.

Two years later, fortune smiled upon the young orphan when Jacob van Ruisdael, Amsterdam's most celebrated landscape painter, accepted him as an apprentice. This mentorship would prove transformative, though Hobbema's relationship with his master transcended the typical teacher-student dynamic—they became lifelong friends, with Ruisdael serving as best man at Hobbema's wedding in 1668. Their bond was so strong that they traveled together on sketching expeditions to Germany in the early 1660s, sharing artistic discoveries and techniques.

Despite his artistic training, Hobbema never achieved financial success during his peak creative years. In 1668, at age thirty, he married Eeltje Vinck, a former servant who had worked for Amsterdam's burgomaster. This connection proved providential, securing Hobbema a position as municipal wine-gauger, responsible for weighing and measuring imported wines. The steady salary this position provided marked the beginning of the end of his painting career—his artistic output dropped dramatically after 1668, and he apparently ceased painting entirely after 1689.

Hobbema's final years were marked by personal tragedy and financial hardship. His wife and four children died in 1704, leaving him alone and impoverished. When he died on December 7, 1709, the man who had created some of the Dutch Golden Age's most celebrated landscapes was buried in a pauper's grave. The irony of his fate—achieving posthumous fame while dying in poverty—reflects the often harsh realities faced by artists in an era before systematic patronage or art market infrastructure.

And that's it!

If you have any details you think Perplexity left out, reply to this email and I'll adjust my prompt to nudge it to include it next time.

This blog was part of my daily newsletter. You can subscribe to it here.

Thanks for reading!

-JP

Current prompt: I want you to create a newsletter post describing the fun and exciting stories around a painting. It should be a newsletter read for leisure and should be an enjoyable read (not just a list of facts) here's what you’re gonna do: Find the name of the following painting in its original language and any alternative names it goes by. Then Research the painting and give me blurb telling me all you can about the artist, the historical context/events it was created in, the style, the materials used, the composition and visual elements, the story/underlying message, what inspired the work/what it meant to the author, and whatever other info you find that helps give a complete understanding of the work. A description of what is depicted (mention subjects) should be the first thing, while the “biography” of the artist should be last. if the work has a lot of meaning behind it, then that is what the meat of the newsletter should be. Besides that you are free to present the information in a concise and captivating way, with the most interesting and novel stuff closest to the top. Order the presentation of information for which pieces have the most compelling and interesting story to tell. At least some of the description should be formatted like a story. [for example: a couple sits on a bench watching the sunset while a man next to them…]. ONLY include information that is for THIS SPECIFIC PAINTING. you will find info on paintings similar to this one but NOT this one. OMMIT INFO ABOUT SUCH PIECES. remember, the goal is to make the most compelling, intriguing, and fun to read newsletter as possible, so keep that above all else.